
AI Safety and the Age of Dislightenment
Abstract
Proposals for stringent AI model licensing and surveillance will likely be ineffective or counterproductive, concentrating power in unsustainable ways, and potentially rolling back the societal gains of the Enlightenment. The balance between defending society and empowering society to defend itself is delicate. We should advocate for openness, humility and broad consultation to develop better responses aligned with our principles and values — responses that can evolve as we learn more about this technology with the potential to transform society for good or ill.
Read entire article on the fast.ai website
Recently on :
Artificial Intelligence
Regulations | Policy
Security | Surveillance | Privacy
WEB - 2025-11-13
Measuring political bias in Claude
Anthropic gives insights into their evaluation methods to measure political bias in models.
WEB - 2025-10-09
Defining and evaluating political bias in LLMs
OpenAI created a political bias evaluation that mirrors real-world usage to stress-test their models’ ability to remain objecti...
WEB - 2025-07-23
Preventing Woke AI In Federal Government
Citing concerns that ideological agendas like Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) are compromising accuracy, this executive ...
WEB - 2025-07-10
America’s AI Action Plan
To win the global race for technological dominance, the US outlined a bold national strategy for unleashing innovation, buildin...
WEB - 2024-12-30
Fine-tune ModernBERT for text classification using synthetic data
David Berenstein explains how to finetune a ModernBERT model for text classification on a synthetic dataset generated from argi...