AI Safety and the Age of Dislightenment
Abstract
Proposals for stringent AI model licensing and surveillance will likely be ineffective or counterproductive, concentrating power in unsustainable ways, and potentially rolling back the societal gains of the Enlightenment. The balance between defending society and empowering society to defend itself is delicate. We should advocate for openness, humility and broad consultation to develop better responses aligned with our principles and values — responses that can evolve as we learn more about this technology with the potential to transform society for good or ill.
Read entire article on the fast.ai website
Recently on :
Artificial Intelligence
Regulations | Policy
Security | Surveillance | Privacy
PITTI - 2024-09-19
A bubble in AI?
Bubble or true technological revolution? While the path forward isn't without obstacles, the value being created by AI extends ...
PITTI - 2024-09-08
Artificial Intelligence : what everyone can agree on
Artificial Intelligence is a divisive subject that sparks numerous debates about both its potential and its limitations. Howeve...
WEB - 2024-03-04
Nvidia bans using translation layers for CUDA software | Tom's Hardware
Tom's Hardware - Nvidia has banned running CUDA-based software on other hardware platforms using translation layers in its lice...
WEB - 2024-02-21
Retell AI : conversational speech engine
Retell tackle the challenge of real time conversations with voice AI.
WEB - 2024-02-21
Groq Inference Tokenomics: Speed, But At What Cost? | Semianalysis
Semianalysis - Groq, an AI hardware startup, has been making waves with their impressive demos showcasing Mistral Mixtral 8x7b ...